Physical actualisation route

Current approved assessment

Evidence position

NOT PRESENTLY EMPIRICALLY TESTABLE

Review depth

BASELINE SURVEY

Evidence movement

Initial observation — no prior comparable baseline linked

Historical candidate: conceptual bridge unresolved; no empirical discriminator supplied. Do not inherit support from relational physics.

Why it sits here

The closest retained positive comparator is Tegmark's mathematical-universe argument, which begins with observer-independent physical reality and argues for its mathematical character [S30]. Causal structural realism instead gives physical relations primitive causal significance [S31]. These are different grounding commitments, not independent confirmations of the proposed route.

Principal uncertainty

An unspecified route may eventually support an assessable argument; this bounded search cannot establish impossibility or exhaustive absence of relevant proposals. Present status concerns this formulation, not whether relational reality exists.

What would change the view?

Before further commissioning, state the grammar, the meaning of efficacy, an explicit bridge with premises exposed, and a comparator that leaves grounding open. An empirical upgrade also requires a differential physical prediction.

Launch-v1 depth

Baseline-only public wrapper. No deeper evidence artefacts are fabricated.

Approved history