T0 · 2026-09-14

Event

SWEEP-B2-PRN-002-20260914

Evidence position

METHOD / BOUNDARY

Review depth

BASELINE SURVEY

Scope

Coherence of the stated acceptance of an already actual quantum-character domain while leaving ultimate grounding open. External literature can contextualize this explanatory boundary; it cannot establish that CGS consistently observes it. No empirical scoring of the boundary and no deeper conceptual audit.

Uncertainty

External scholarship cannot establish the historical or textual claim that current CGS consistently begins this way. The ultimate grounding question remains open rather than an unconfirmed empirical prediction.

History is append-only.