Accepted quantum starting boundary

Current approved assessment

Evidence position

METHOD / BOUNDARY

Review depth

BASELINE SURVEY

Evidence movement

Initial observation — no prior comparable baseline linked

Conceptual boundary: no empirical score; do not transfer quantum physics' success to CGS-specific grounding.

Why it sits here

Philosophy of cosmology distinguishes explaining an early physical state or classical spacetime from explaining why anything exists [S50]. Quantum theory also separates a successful predictive formalism from unsettled ontological interpretation [S51]. These distinctions make the proposed starting commitment intelligible without supplying independent confirmation of CGS.

Principal uncertainty

External scholarship cannot establish the historical or textual claim that current CGS consistently begins this way. The ultimate grounding question remains open rather than an unconfirmed empirical prediction.

What would change the view?

Revisit if opening language claims to derive actuality, if quantum-character is assigned a restrictive ontology, or if a specific grounding mechanism becomes part of this node.

Launch-v1 depth

Baseline-only public wrapper. No deeper evidence artefacts are fabricated.

Approved history