T0 · 2026-09-14
ESTABLISHED / STRONGLY EVIDENCED · BASELINE SURVEY
PRN-005 / v0.1 · current
Consequential retained constraint
A retained carrier or constraint must be capable of alteration or removal such that a later outcome changes, under the specified comparison.
Current approved assessment
Dated pilot entry retained unchanged. Scope qualifiers are transcribed from its assessment; no new evidential evaluation.
Why it sits here
Synaptic plasticity and material memory provide mechanistically different territories for testing this question. Their established domain explanations can implement the common counterfactual test without establishing a new force, universal mechanism or cross-scale evolutionary process. Scope must specify the carrier, comparison and readout.
Principal uncertainty
Does a new case isolate the retained carrier from current-input, retrieval and common-cause effects?
What would change the view?
Level 2 is recommended before this structurally important node is used beyond the bounded cases or as a cross-domain bridge. Clarify empirical instance versus operational criterion and inspect matched storage/access controls. Node health: scope clarification needed; no split or wording change is enacted.
Launch-v1 depth
Baseline-only public wrapper. No deeper evidence artefacts are fabricated.
Approved history
Controlled TERP artefacts remain authoritative. This website is a publication layer.