T0 · 2026-09-14
CURRENTLY UNSUPPORTED · BASELINE SURVEY
PRN-038 / v0.1 · branch
Altered fundamental possibility space
The proposed wildcard process might alter fundamental rule or possibility space rather than rearrange states under existing rules.
Current approved assessment
Unestablished strongest novelty claim; conceptual precedents provide no transferred confirmation.
Why it sits here
Evolving-law proposals exist, but they confront how a changing law differs from a changing state governed by a higher-level rule [S124]. Effective field theory gives concrete cases where different effective interactions arise within one underlying theory [S34]. Constructor theory separately distinguishes fundamental possibility from knowledge- or resource-limited attainability [S125].
Principal uncertainty
The term possibility space may denote fundamental physical admissibility, effective state space or currently accessible capacities. Those interpretations have different evidence requirements. The review establishes no impossibility theorem for the strongest interpretation.
What would change the view?
Revisit when a rule-space definition, transition mechanism and bounded discriminator are supplied. A concrete residual beyond a specified fixed-rule account could justify focused review.
Launch-v1 depth
Baseline-only public wrapper. No deeper evidence artefacts are fabricated.
Approved history
Controlled TERP artefacts remain authoritative. This website is a publication layer.