Removable Beyond

Current approved assessment

Evidence position

METHOD / BOUNDARY

Review depth

BASELINE SURVEY

Evidence movement

Initial observation — no prior comparable baseline linked

Method boundary; no empirical score and no completed compliance audit.

Why it sits here

Formal conservativity supplies a useful neighbouring example: extensions can preserve earlier interpretations under specified independence conditions [S85]. Scientific theories also include interpretive and practical components, making a solely textual separation potentially inadequate [S86]. Neither literature establishes that this programme has achieved removability.

Principal uncertainty

Which local inferences and interpretive commitments remain dependent on optional premises is unknown. Withdrawing an assumption and establishing its falsity can have different consequences when a supposedly local claim independently entails it.

What would change the view?

Revisit on a future release supplying explicit claim dependencies, or on identification of one indispensable Beyond premise in a local inference. Changes remain subject to the stated human-approval rule.

Launch-v1 depth

Baseline-only public wrapper. No deeper evidence artefacts are fabricated.

Approved history