Physical-carrier boundary

Current approved assessment

Evidence position

METHOD / BOUNDARY

Review depth

BASELINE SURVEY

Evidence movement

Initial observation — no prior comparable baseline linked

Keep as an explanatory adequacy boundary, outside empirical evidence totals.

Why it sits here

The philosophy of laws separates identifying a proposed lawmaking relation from showing that it supports the intended inference [S101]. Mechanistic accounts likewise ask how organised activities explain a specified phenomenon [S102]. These provide conceptual standards, not experimental confirmation of this programme.

Principal uncertainty

The candidate gives no particular derivation to assess. 'Actual specified physical account' may mean an articulated proposal or a confirmed account; those are different demands. A proposed account can be clearly specified while remaining unconfirmed.

What would change the view?

Review a concrete physical derivation when one is supplied, especially if persistence is its sole premise or a nonmechanistic account is excluded without argument.

Launch-v1 depth

Baseline-only public wrapper. No deeper evidence artefacts are fabricated.

Approved history