Preserve what worked
Keep the useful result and enough context to understand it later.
Human-led. AI-enabled. Start with what matters.
Explore · Build
Some of the best methods began with things going wrong.
Sometimes a useful conversation is enough. Sometimes you want to keep the result, use the process again, or share it with somebody else. That is when a little structure starts to earn its place.
Try a repeatable-method prompt
Keep the useful result and enough context to understand it later.
Be clear about what should improve and what must stay.
Review the new version, confirm it is actually saved, and only then make it the new baseline.
What this could help with
This has become useful enough that I do not want to lose it or start again.
What transfers: Not everybody needs a full controlled method. A saved prompt, checklist or document may be enough. The structure should grow only when the value, duration or consequence of the work makes it worthwhile.

Our example — how we used it
Grey Matters did not begin as a neat method. The method emerged because of lost context, uncertain versions, work that had not really been saved, and the occasional virtual toy being thrown from a virtual pram.
The answer was not process for its own sake. It was to preserve what was useful while reducing the chance of losing it.
Whiteboard is where we think, challenge and decide. Controlled Work turns agreed changes into artefacts. Specialist Tools help where they genuinely add value. Externalise turns the result into something other people can use, inspect or learn from.
AI can help
AI can help turn a useful process into a checklist, repeatable prompt, controlled outcomes that can be understood and used again.
You still decide
You decide what must be preserved, what can change and when the result is good enough to rely on. Check that it has actually been saved.
Try it yourself
We have done [task] more than once now. Help me identify what should be made repeatable, what should remain flexible, what needs to be preserved, and what checks would stop us making the same mistakes again. Keep the method proportionate to the importance of the work.Adapt this prompt